Sagot :
Réponse:
The Philadelphia "represent" exhibition consists of 75 works on the art of black Americans. it behaves 200 years of African-American art.
this exhibition overlooks major African-American designers, first and foremost David Hammond.
These people have always produced, with discretion or denial, despite the difficulties of accessing any training. Each piece chosen makes sense, raises a question, supports the demonstration. The exhibition has great merit, it blows up categories, also incorporating art brut. Above all, it also demonstrates the stereotypes.
I'm going to tell you about David Drake who was a slave who could read and write. He had signed his object with the name of "Dave" by asserting his individuality, he was risking a lot.
let's also talk about Bill Traylor who was also born a slave. He is recognized because he had started to draw his past life in the fields
However, can we speak of a specifically black artistic identity? As early as the 1920s, two African-American intellectuals debated the issue. For art critic George Schuyler, there was no such thing as black art. “Whites and blacks come from the same localities, they speak, think and act the same,” he writes in his essay The Negro Art Hokum
a painting by Jacob Lawrence, depicting two mixed marriages. The title speaks for itself: Taboo. It is 1963 and such unions are illegal in 22 American states.
So we can see that African American art is essentially based on expressing oneself and stopping discrimination. They want to change mentalities through his works created by his slaves
Réponse:
The Philadelphia "represent" exhibition consists of 75 works on the art of black Americans. it behaves 200 years of African-American art. this exhibition overlooks major African-American designers, first and foremost David Hammond. These people have always produced, with discretion or denial, despite the difficulties of accessing any training. Each piece chosen makes sense, raises a question, supports the demonstration. The exhibition has great merit, it blows up categories, also incorporating art brut. Above all, it also demonstrates the stereotypes. I'm going to tell you about David Drake who was a slave who could read and write. He had signed his object with the name of "Dave" by asserting his individuality, he was risking a lot. let's also talk about Bill Traylor who was also born a slave. He is recognized because he had started to draw his past life in the fields However, can we speak of a specifically black artistic identity? As early as the 1920s, two African-American intellectuals debated the issue. For art critic George Schuyler, there was no such thing as black art. “Whites and blacks come from the same localities, they speak, think and act the same,” he writes in his essay The Negro Art Hokum a painting by Jacob Lawrence, depicting two mixed marriages. The title speaks for itself: Taboo. It is 1963 and such unions are illegal in 22 American states. So we can see that African American art is essentially based on expressing oneself and stopping discrimination. They want to change mentalities through his works created by his slaves