Sagot :
Réponse :
Dear Diary,
I spoke with Lady Catherine today. She wants me not to marry her nephew. According to her, this young man, Mr Darcy, must marry his daughter.
My purpose was not to cause her pain by refusing to make an engagement never to marry Mr Darcy, but... but it was stronger than I was. I refused to be persuaded, to be influenced, intimidated by his arguments, his orders, his hurtful allusions, that I am an unreasonable woman.
Lady Catherine also insinuated that Darcy was superior to her, or at least that Darcy's family was superior to hers. Elizabeth replied that Mr Darcy was a good man, and that she was the daughter of a good man, and so, on that point, they were equal.
In any case, if I had promised, would their marriage be more certain? Supposing he were attached to me, would my refusal to accept his hand make him inclined to agree to it with his cousin?
I am not so simple in character, I am not so easy to deal with, and I have told her not to interfere in my affairs. But why did I refuse that promise? Probably because deep down I might accept Mr Darcy's love, for I feel something for him. In fact I could not bring myself to lie and answer in the affirmative when Lady Catherine asked me, "And do you promise never to make such a commitment?" but she also made me so furious with her insulting, frivolous remarks about me, about my young Sister Lydia and her husband Mr Wickham speaking of their escape, Mr Darcy's father's intendant. I became angry, and so I ended the discussion!
Dear newspaper ,
Today , I spoke with Lady Catherine , she would not want me to marry her nephew. According to her, Mr Darcy must marry his daughter. My goal was not to cause him pain by refusing to take the pledge never to get engaged to Mr Darcy, but I refused to be persuaded, to let myself be influenced, intimidated by his arguments, his orders, his hurtful allusions, saying I’m an unreasonable woman. Lady Catherine also insinuated that Darcy was superior to herself, or at least that his family was superior to hers. Elizabeth replied that Mr Darcy was a nice man and that she was the daughter of a nice man and that on this point they were equal. Anyway, if I had promised, would their marriage be more likely persuade, to let me influence, intimidate by her arguments, her orders, her hurtful allusions, saying that I am an unreasonable woman. Lady Catherine also insinuated that Darcy was superior to herself, or at least that his family was superior to hers. Elizabeth replied that Mr Darcy was a nice man and that she was the daughter of a nice man and that on this point they were equal.Anyway, if I had promised, would their marriage be more likely? Assuming he’s attached to me, would my refusal to accept his hand make him want to give it to his cousin? Indeed, I do not have such a simple character, I told her that she should not meddle in my affairs. But then why did I refuse this promise? Probably because deep down inside I could accept Mr Darcy’s love, because I feel something for him.In reality I could not bring myself to lie by answering in the affirmative when Lady Catherine asked me "And do you promise me never to make such a commitment? '' but , she also made me so furious , by her insulting , frivolous , remarks about me , about my younger sister Lydia and her husband Mister Wickham speaking about their escape , the intendant of Mr. Darcy’s father. I got mad, and so I ended the discussion!
Tiens j’ai pris du temps mais c’est fais avec mais propre mots
J’ai vus que qq t’as répondu lors de mon absence.Du coup tu pourras choisir celui qui le mieux et celui que tu apprécies le plus.
Au revoir
Today , I spoke with Lady Catherine , she would not want me to marry her nephew. According to her, Mr Darcy must marry his daughter. My goal was not to cause him pain by refusing to take the pledge never to get engaged to Mr Darcy, but I refused to be persuaded, to let myself be influenced, intimidated by his arguments, his orders, his hurtful allusions, saying I’m an unreasonable woman. Lady Catherine also insinuated that Darcy was superior to herself, or at least that his family was superior to hers. Elizabeth replied that Mr Darcy was a nice man and that she was the daughter of a nice man and that on this point they were equal. Anyway, if I had promised, would their marriage be more likely persuade, to let me influence, intimidate by her arguments, her orders, her hurtful allusions, saying that I am an unreasonable woman. Lady Catherine also insinuated that Darcy was superior to herself, or at least that his family was superior to hers. Elizabeth replied that Mr Darcy was a nice man and that she was the daughter of a nice man and that on this point they were equal.Anyway, if I had promised, would their marriage be more likely? Assuming he’s attached to me, would my refusal to accept his hand make him want to give it to his cousin? Indeed, I do not have such a simple character, I told her that she should not meddle in my affairs. But then why did I refuse this promise? Probably because deep down inside I could accept Mr Darcy’s love, because I feel something for him.In reality I could not bring myself to lie by answering in the affirmative when Lady Catherine asked me "And do you promise me never to make such a commitment? '' but , she also made me so furious , by her insulting , frivolous , remarks about me , about my younger sister Lydia and her husband Mister Wickham speaking about their escape , the intendant of Mr. Darcy’s father. I got mad, and so I ended the discussion!
Tiens j’ai pris du temps mais c’est fais avec mais propre mots
J’ai vus que qq t’as répondu lors de mon absence.Du coup tu pourras choisir celui qui le mieux et celui que tu apprécies le plus.
Au revoir